The Multifactorial Nature of Extraversion-Introversion in the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator and Eysenck Personality Inventory

Gary J. Sipps, Ralph A. Alexander

Educational and Psychological Measurement · 1987 · 38 citations · 16 references

Concepts

TL;DR

The MBTI’s psychometric properties are poorly studied compared to the extensively researched EPI. The study aimed to test construct validity of extraversion‑introversion and examine its measurement by the MBTI and EPI. Factor analysis was performed on responses from 840 participants to both the MBTI and EPI. Factor analysis retained seven factors, identifying three extraversion components—sociability, impulsivity/non‑planning, and liveliness/risk‑taking/jocularity—confirming extraversion‑introversion as a complex construct, and unexpectedly validating the MBTI‑EI and MBTI‑JP scales as measures of impulsivity/non‑planning, with implications for future research.

Abstract

The study was designed to test the construct validity of extraversion-introversion and to explore the nature of the concept as measured by the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) and the Eysenck Personality Inventory (EPI). The psychometric properties of the MBTI have been inadequately studied, whereas those of the EPI have been investigated extensively. Responses of 840 subjects to the two measures were submitted in toto to factor analysis. Of the seven factors retained, three measures of extraversion appeared: Factor 2 (a sociability component), Factor 4 (an impulsivity/non-planning component), and Factor 7 (a liveliness/risk-taking/jocularity component). Findings supported the view of extraversion-introversion as a complex construct (Eysenck and Eysenck, 1977; Guilford, 1977; Howarth, 1976). The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator-Extraversion Introversion (MBTI-EI) and the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator-Judging Perceiving (MBTI-JP), scales were found, surprisingly, to be factorially valid measures of impulsivity/non-planning. Implications and suggested research are discussed.

References

16