Journal of Policy Analysis and Management · 2003 · 44 citations · 28 references
Consent DecreesLegal RemedyConstitutional LawLawAdministrative LawSocial SciencesUrban GovernanceCivil Rights ActionsGovernmental ProcessU.s. DepartmentHousing AuthoritiesHousing GovernanceLegal ProcessHousingAffirmative LitigationPublic PolicyUrban PolicyUrban PlanningPublic HousingResidential DevelopmentConstitutional LitigationAffordable HousingHousing PolicyUrban Social JusticeJusticePolitical Science
Abstract Between 1992 and 1996 the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) settled a number of legal cases involving housing authorities and agreed to take remedial action as part of court‐enforced consent decrees entered into with plaintiffs. These housing authorities faced significant obstacles that impaired their ability to comply swiftly and fully with all of the elements in the desegregation consent decrees. The obstacles fell into two broad categories: contextual obstacles (racial composition of waiting lists and resident populations, lack of affordable rental housing, and inadequate public transportation), and capacity and coordination obstacles (conflict among implementing agencies and ineffective monitoring by HUD). Findings presented here highlight the sizable potential delay between the time a legal remedy is imposed and when plaintiffs in public housing segregation disputes realize any benefits. They also reinforce the argument that implementation problems will be legion when policies impose a significant scope of required changes on a large number of actors who must collaborate, yet are not uniformly capable or sympathetic to the goals being promoted. © 2003 by the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management.
28
Implementation and Public Policy
Daniel A. Mazmanian · CrossRef Listing of Deleted DOIs · 1984 · 1.3K citations · Full text