Journal of Wound Care · 2001 · 91 citations · 18 references
Veterinary MedicineCommunity MedicineInfection PreventionWater TreatmentWound HealingInfection ManagementIrrigation ProtocolsWound CareWound CleansingWound InfectionWound ManagementAcute Wound CleansingHealing Outcome MeasurementNormal Saline CleansingNormal Saline IrrigationWound Cleansing SafetyWound Healing SafetyWound HygieneWound Irrigation
OBJECTIVE: This double-blind randomised controlled trial compared the effects of tap water and normal saline on the healing and infection rates of acute and chronic wounds. METHOD: The trial was conducted in two metropolitan community health centres in New South Wales, Australia. Thirty-five patients with 49 acute or chronic wounds were randomised to receive wound irrigation with either normal saline or tap water. RESULTS: Statistical analysis demonstrated there was no significant difference between the infection and healing rates in wounds irrigated with normal saline or tap water. CONCLUSION: Although the small sample size is a limitation of this study, the researchers conclude that drinkable tap water appears to provide a safe alternative to normal saline for wound cleansing and may be preferred by some patients.
18
Criteria for identifying wound infection
Keith Cutting, Keith G Harding · Journal of Wound Care · 1994 · 310 citations
Annals of Internal Medicine · 2015 · 199 citations