Multiple Arousal Theory and Daily-Life Electrodermal Activity Asymmetry

Rosalind W. Picard, Szymon Fedor, Yadid Ayzenberg

Emotion Review · 2015 · 289 citations · 30 references

Concepts

TL;DR

Large‑scale continuous sensor data reveal that electrodermal activity can differ markedly between the left and right upper body, challenging traditional assumptions about uniform sympathetic arousal. The study aims to demonstrate that multiple emotional substrates drive asymmetric sympathetic innervation, as evidenced by daily‑life and controlled‑study data. It proposes a multiple‑arousal theory in which distinct neural substrates produce side‑specific sympathetic activation, accounting for the observed EDA asymmetry. The results indicate that relying on a single‑side EDA measurement can misjudge arousal, underscoring the need for bilateral assessment.

Abstract

Using “big data” from sensors worn continuously outside the lab, researchers have observed patterns of objective physiology that challenge some of the long-standing theoretical concepts of emotion and its measurement. One challenge is that emotional arousal, when measured as sympathetic nervous system activation through electrodermal activity, can sometimes differ significantly across the two halves of the upper body. We show that traditional measures on only one side may lead to misjudgment of arousal. This article presents daily life and controlled study data, as well as existing evidence from neuroscience, supporting the influence of multiple emotional substrates in the brain causing innervation on different sides of the body. We describe how a theory of multiple arousals explains the asymmetric EDA findings.

References

30