ACS Nano · 2015 · 142 citations · 13 references
Natural SciencesMaterials EngineeringMaterials ScienceNanomaterialsNanotechnologyRisk AssessmentChemical SafetyHealth Risk AssessmentNanotoxicologyNanotubesRisk CharacterizationSafety EvaluationChemical Risk RegulationEnvironmental Risk RegulationHuman Health EffectsNanomaterial Safety RegulationNanomaterials RegulationNanotechnology RegulationRegulatory ScrutinyTechnological Hazard Classification
For nanotechnology to meet its potential as a game-changing and sustainable technology, it is important to ensure that the engineered nanomaterials and nanoenabled products that gain entry to the marketplace are safe and effective. Tools and methods are needed for regulatory purposes to allow rapid material categorization according to human health and environmental risk potential, so that materials of high concern can be targeted for additional scrutiny, while material categories that pose the least risk can receive expedited review. Using carbon nanotubes as an example, we discuss how data from alternative testing strategies can be used to facilitate engineered nanomaterial categorization according to risk potential and how such an approach could facilitate regulatory decision-making in the future.
13
Anna A. Shvedova, Elena R. Kisin, Ashley Murray et al. · American Journal of Physiology-Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology · 2008 · 640 citations · Full text
Natural Sciences, Materials Engineering, Materials Science +16
Blake Gardner, Frederick S. Ling, Philip K. Hopke et al. · Particle and Fibre Toxicology · 2014 · 380 citations · Full text
Categorization framework to aid hazard identification of nanomaterials
Steffen Foss Hansen, Britt H. Larsen, Stig Irving Olsen et al. · Nanotoxicology · 2007 · 228 citations
Xiang Wang, Tian Xia, Susana Addo Ntim et al. · ACS Nano · 2011 · 199 citations · Full text