Radiologia Brasileira · 2014 · 27 citations · 15 references
MedicineRadiologyAuditingCancer ScreeningDiagnostic ImagingBreast Cancer ImagingBreast ExaminationBreast ImagingDuctal Carcinoma In SituBi-rads ClassificationBreast Examination FindingsBreast Examination In ScreeningBreast Lesion DiagnosisMammographyPositive Predictive ValuePositive Predictive Value EstimationScreening Mammography
OBJECTIVE: Undertaking of a complete audit of the service of mammography, as recommended by BI-RADS(®), in a private reference institution for breast cancer diagnosis in the city of São Paulo, SP, Brazil, and comparison of results with those recommended by the literature. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective, analytical and cross-sectional study including 8,000 patients submitted to mammography in the period between April 2010 and March 2011, whose results were subjected to an internal audit. The patients were followed-up until December 2012. RESULTS: The radiological classification of 7,249 screening mammograms, according to BI-RADS, was the following: category 0 (1.43%), 1 (7.82%), 2 (80.76%), 3 (8.35%), 4 (1.46%), 5 (0.15%) and 6 (0.03%). The breast cancer detection ratio was 4.8 cases per 1,000 mammograms. Ductal carcinoma in situ was found in 22.8% of cases. Positive predictive values for categories 3, 4 and 5 were 1.3%, 41.3% and 100%, respectively. In the present study, the sensitivity of the method was 97.1% and specificity, 97.4%. CONCLUSION: The complete internal audit of a service of mammography is essential to evaluate the quality of such service, which reflects on an early breast cancer detection and reduction of mortality rates.
15
REDUCTION IN MORTALITY FROM BREAST CANCER AFTER MASS SCREENING WITH MAMMOGRAPHY
Làszló Tabár, Ahmed Z. Gad, Lars Holmberg et al. · The Lancet · 1985 · 1.8K citations
BI-RADS Categorization As a Predictor of Malignancy
Susan G. Orel, Nicole Kay, Carol Reynolds et al. · Radiology · 1999 · 390 citations
F M Hall, J M Storella, D Z Silverstone et al. · Radiology · 1988 · 292 citations