Urologia Internationalis · 2005 · 30 citations · 18 references
MedicineSurgeryUrologyUrogenital SurgeryUrolithiasisUrologic SurgeryKidney SurgeryPercutaneous NephrolithotomyRenal DiseaseRenal SurgeryUrologic InterventionsAnalgesic DurationHospital Stay DurationNephrostomy PlacementOperating Room Time UtilizationPercutaneous Nephrolithotomy ComparisonRenal CalculiTotally Tubeless Percutaneous NephrolithotomyUreteral Calculi
INTRODUCTION: To assess the efficacy, safety and morbidity of tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and fifty-two patients with renal and upper ureteric calculi were included in this study. Sixty-nine patients (71 renal units; group 1) in whom no nephrostomy tube was placed at the conclusion of the procedure was compared with a similar control group of 83 patients (group 2) in whom a nephrostomy tube was placed. Operating time, blood loss, analgesia requirement, puncture site urinary leakage, hospital stay and mean convalescence period were compared in both groups. RESULTS: Both groups were similar with respect to age, sex distribution and stone size. Operating time and blood loss were less in group 1 although they did not reach statistical significance. The mean analgesic requirement, puncture site urinary leakage and hospital stay were significantly less in group 1. CONCLUSION: Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy is a safe and effective procedure in this selected group of patients.
18
I. Fernström, Bengt Johansson · Scandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology · 1976 · 1.3K citations
Tubeless Percutaneous Renal Surgery
Gary C. Bellman, Ramin Davidoff, Joseph Candela et al. · The Journal of Urology · 1997 · 334 citations
Medicine, Nephrology, Surgery +7
Percutaneous Stone Manipulation
P. Alken, G. Hutschenreiter, Rolf W. Günther et al. · The Journal of Urology · 2016 · 294 citations