Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · 1989 · 307 citations · 38 references
MedicineNeurosciencePsychologyCognitive NeuroscienceVisual AttentionVisual PerceptionNeural Basis Of AttentionParietal Lobe FunctionsSelective AttentionSpatial AttentionVisual Evoked PotentialsVisual SystemAttention-related PotentialsEvent-related Potential MarkersEvent-related Potential ParadigmsEvent-related Potentials In AttentionHemispheric Asymmetry AnalysisPeripheral AttentionPeripheral Visual FieldVisual Attention Modulation
The study examined neural processes underlying the direction of spatial attention and the subsequent modulation of sensory input in children. Children aged 6–9 were presented with an arrow cue that shifted attention from central to peripheral vision, followed by targets appearing 600 ms later in attended or ignored fields. Attention to left versus right produced contralateral slow potentials before targets, with an early negative parietal component (~200 ms) reflecting attention allocation and a later positive occipital–parietal component (~60 ms after target) reflecting sensory modulation; these effects replicated on P1, N1, and P3, and boys showed greater arousal and faster selective processing than girls.
Neural processes associated with two aspects of visual-spatial attention were investigated with event-related potential (ERPs): those that direct spatial attention to a given point in space and those that modulate the processing of sensory input after attention has been directed. The subjects were 6- to 9-year-old children (51 boys and 35 girls). An arrow cue directed attention from the central to peripheral visual field; targets were then flashed in the attended or ignored visual field 600 msec after the cue. The directing of attention to the left vs. right visual field was associated with hemispheric differences in slow potentials prior to the presentation of the targets. The earliest potential, which started about 200 msec after the cue and was negative over the hemisphere contralateral to the direction of attention, was greatest over the parietal area and appeared to reflect processes directing attention per se. The last potential, which peaked 60 msec after the target and was positive over the hemisphere contralateral to the direction of attention, was greatest over the occipital-parietal region. It appeared to reflect the modulation of cortical excitability in the regions receiving input from the relevant and irrelevant visual fields. The effects of spatial attention on P1, N1, and P3 ERP components following the targets replicated previous results. Boys appeared more aroused (as indicated by CNVs) and reflected faster and greater selective processing (as indicated by reaction time, and N1-P1 latency and amplitude) than girls.
38
Leslie G. Ungerleider · Medical Entomology and Zoology · 1982 · 4.2K citations
Sex differences in human brain asymmetry: a critical survey
Jeannette McGlone · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · 1980 · 1.4K citations
Parietal lobe mechanisms for directed visual attention
James C. Lynch, Vernon B. Mountcastle, William Henry Fox Talbot et al. · Journal of Neurophysiology · 1977 · 929 citations
Increased Attention Enhances Both Behavioral and Neuronal Performance
Hedva Spitzer, Robert Desimone, Jeffrey Moran · Science · 1988 · 826 citations
Medicine, Neurobiology, Neuroscience +14