Water Resources Research · 1992 · 91 citations · 32 references
BusinessDecision SciencesWater Resources ManagementDecision AnalysisDecision TheoryProbability TheoryBayesian Decision TheoryBayesian InferenceBayesian StatisticsDecision Under UncertaintyDecision-making Under UncertaintyUncertainty RepresentationBayesian AnalysisBayesian Uncertainty AnalysisDecision Theory Under UncertaintyDempster - Shafer TheoryDempster-shafer TheoryImprecise ProbabilitiesPrecisionProbabilistic Reasoning
Decision‑making in water resources often relies on limited data, yet conventional Bayesian analysis imposes precise distributions that can over‑precise weak information, so imprecise probability methods such as Dempster–Shafer theory allow probability intervals to better reflect uncertainty. The study describes theoretical aspects of Dempster–Shafer theory and its application to inference and decision analysis. The authors applied the Dempster–Shafer approach to a water‑resources decision‑making example. They found that the Dempster–Shafer results differed from those of the equivalent Bayesian scheme.
The information and data used to support decision making under uncertainty in water resources situations can often be characterized as being very limited or weak. The representation of knowledge in conventional Bayesian decision analysis is in the form of precisely specified distributions and is the same no matter how weak the information source for this knowledge. A Bayesian analysis therefore may inadvertently impart too much precision to the input information and to the results. The concept of imprecise probability addresses this problem of excessive precision and a number of methods incorporating this concept have emerged. One such method, developed by Dempster and Shafer, accommodates greater imprecision by allowing the specification of probabilities on intervals. Theoretical aspects of the Dempster‐Shafer methodology and its application to inference and decision analysis are described. A water resources example of an application of the Dempster‐Shafer approach is presented, and the results contrasted with those obtained from the closest equivalent Bayesian scheme.
32
Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
Amos Tversky, Daniel Kahneman · Science · 1974 · 28K citations
Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
Amos Tversky, Daniel Kahneman · 1975 · 23.1K citations
Risk, Ambiguity, and the Savage Axioms
Daniel Ellsberg · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · 1961 · 7.9K citations
Business, Mathematics, Philosophy +12
Rational Choice and the Framing of Decisions
Amos Tversky, Daniel Kahneman · The Journal of Business · 1986 · 3.6K citations