Anaesthesia · 2000 · 52 citations · 8 references
Veterinary MedicineAnesthesiologyPharmacotherapyAnesthesiaAnesthetic TechniquesGeneral AnesthesiaAirway AssessmentAirway ImprovementAirway Management After AnesthesiaAirway Management During Intravenous AnesthesiaLaryngeal Mask Airway DevicesLaryngeal Mask Airway UseMask AnesthesiaMouth Opening MeasurementPropofol InductionPropofol Use
In a double-blind randomised study, we compared conditions during insertion of the laryngeal mask airway in 150 patients who received either fentanyl 1 microg.kg-1, mivacurium 0.04 mg.kg-1 or normal saline, before induction of anaesthesia with propofol 2 mg.kg-1. Insertion conditions, including mouth opening, swallowing, gagging or coughing, head or limb movement and ease of insertion, were each graded using a three-point scale. The median (interquartile range) summed insertion scores were more favourable with the use of fentanyl [8.0 (7.0-9.0)] and mivacurium [7.5 (6.8-8.3)] than with normal saline [9.0 (7.8-10.3); p < 0.01]. Fentanyl and mivacurium decreased swallowing and head or limb movement, and mivacurium improved mouth opening. Insertion conditions were similar between fentanyl and mivacurium, while both prolonged apnoea. Fentanyl and mivacurium are equally effective in facilitating insertion of the laryngeal mask airway following anaesthetic induction with propofol.
8
Facilitation of laryngeal mask insertion
M. D. Stoneham, Stephen Bree, J. Robert Sneyd · Anaesthesia · 1995 · 71 citations
Midazolam co‐induction and laryngeal mask insertion
Ian Driver, S. Wiltshire, P. Mills et al. · Anaesthesia · 1996 · 53 citations