Circulation Cardiovascular Imaging · 2015 · 413 citations · 30 references
MedicineCardiologyNuclear MedicineClinical CardiologyDiagnostic ImagingDiagnostic RadiologyCardiac ImagingCardiothoracic ImagingCardiovascular ImagingCoronary AngiographyCoronary Artery DiseaseMyocardial Perfusion ImagingCardiac Myocardial Perfusion ImagingComputed Tomography Coronary AngiographyComputed Tomography Fractional Flow ReserveCoronary Artery Disease DetectionCoronary Artery Disease ImagingFractional Flow Reserve ImagingInvasive AngiographyInvasive Coronary Angiography
BACKGROUND: The choice of imaging techniques in patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) varies between countries, regions, and hospitals. This prospective, multicenter, comparative effectiveness study was designed to assess the relative accuracy of commonly used imaging techniques for identifying patients with significant CAD. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 475 patients with stable chest pain and intermediate likelihood of CAD underwent coronary computed tomographic angiography and stress myocardial perfusion imaging by single photon emission computed tomography or positron emission tomography, and ventricular wall motion imaging by stress echocardiography or cardiac magnetic resonance. If ≥1 test was abnormal, patients underwent invasive coronary angiography. Significant CAD was defined by invasive coronary angiography as >50% stenosis of the left main stem, >70% stenosis in a major coronary vessel, or 30% to 70% stenosis with fractional flow reserve ≤0.8. Significant CAD was present in 29% of patients. In a patient-based analysis, coronary computed tomographic angiography had the highest diagnostic accuracy, the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve being 0.91 (95% confidence interval, 0.88-0.94), sensitivity being 91%, and specificity being 92%. Myocardial perfusion imaging had good diagnostic accuracy (area under the curve, 0.74; confidence interval, 0.69-0.78), sensitivity 74%, and specificity 73%. Wall motion imaging had similar accuracy (area under the curve, 0.70; confidence interval, 0.65-0.75) but lower sensitivity (49%, P<0.001) and higher specificity (92%, P<0.001). The diagnostic accuracy of myocardial perfusion imaging and wall motion imaging were lower than that of coronary computed tomographic angiography (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In a multicenter European population of patients with stable chest pain and low prevalence of CAD, coronary computed tomographic angiography is more accurate than noninvasive functional testing for detecting significant CAD defined invasively. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00979199.
30
An introduction to ROC analysis
Tom Fawcett · Pattern Recognition Letters · 2005 · 21.3K citations
2013 ESC guidelines on the management of stable coronary artery disease
Héctor Bueno · European Heart Journal · 2013 · 4.5K citations · Full text
Matthew J. Budoff, David A. Dowe, James G. Jollis et al. · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2008 · 2.1K citations
Medicine, Cardiology, Radiology +14