Clinical Epigenetics · 2015 · 32 citations · 33 references
MedicineOncologyPathologyCancer ScreeningCytopathologyMolecular DiagnosticsCervical CancerCervical CytologyCervical PathologyCervicovaginal CytologyGynecologic CytologyHuman Papillomavirus InfectionCervical Cancer ScreeningCervical Screening CytologyCervical Squamous LesionsCytology-based DiagnosisPap Smear CytologyPap Smear InterpretationPapanicolaou TestZinc Finger Proteins
INTRODUCTION: The interpretation of equivocal Papanicolaou (Pap) smear results remains challenging, even with the addition of the high-risk human papillomavirus test (HPV-HR). Recently, methylated zinc finger protein 582 (ZNF582) (ZNF582 (m) ) was reported to be highly associated with cervical cancer. In this study, we compared the performance of ZNF582 (m) detection and HPV-HR genotyping in the triage of cervical atypical squamous cell of undetermined significance (ASC-US) and atypical squamous cell - cannot exclude a high-grade lesion (ASC-H). CASE DESCRIPTION: Two hundred and forty-two subjects with equivocal papanicolaou smear (Pap smear) results were recruited in this hospital-based and case-controlled study. The residual cervical cells in liquid-based cytological test (LBC) containers were used for genomic DNA extraction and then for ZNF582 (m) and HPV-HR detection. The level of ZNF582 (m) was quantified by real-time methylation-specific PCR after bisulfite conversion. The HPV-HR test was performed by using a nested multiplex PCR (NMPCR) assay that combines degenerate E6/E7 consensus primers and HPV type-specific primers. DISCUSSION AND EVALUATION: Significant associations were observed between ZNF582 (m) and the risk of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or higher (CIN3+; odds ratio = 15.52, 95% confidence interval (CI): 7.73 to 31.18). The sensitivity and specificity of ZNF582 (m) for women with CIN3+ were 82.43% and 76.79%, respectively. High sensitivity (99.33%) but low specificity (38.76%) was observed for HPV-HR. When combining both positive results of ZNF582 (m) and HPV-HR, the sensitivity and specificity were 82.43% and 81.55%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of ZNF582 (m) or HPV-16/18 were 89.19% and 70.24%, respectively. However, the sensitivity and specificity of ZNF582 (m) combined with HPV-16/18 (both ZNF582 (m) and HPV-16/18 positive results) were 59.46% and 94.64%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: ZNF582 (m) provides a promising triage tool for women with ASC. To effectively manage ASC patients, a new strategy co-testing for ZNF582 (m) and HPV-16/18 genotyping was proposed. This strategy could reduce the number of patients referred for colposcopic examination and thus provide a feasible follow-up solution in the regions where colposcopy is not readily available. This strategy could also prevent women from experiencing unnecessary anxiety caused by HPV-HR.
33
Debbie Saslow, Diane Solomon, Herschel W. Lawson et al. · American Journal of Clinical Pathology · 2012 · 791 citations · Full text
Medicine, Gynecology, Pathology +17
Natural History of Dysplasia of the Uterine Cervix
Philippa Holowaty, A. B. Miller, Thomas E. Rohan et al. · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 1999 · 616 citations
Medicine, Gynecology, Obstetrics +13
Management of women who test positive for high-risk types of human papillomavirus: the HART study
Jack Cuzick, Anne Szarewski, Heather Cubie et al. · The Lancet · 2003 · 505 citations
Medicine, Gynecology, Oncology +16