The Cancer Journal · 2004 · 127 citations · 23 references
MedicineOncologyRadiation OncologyClinical Radiation OncologyRadiobiologyTreatment PlanningCraniospinal IrradiationPediatric Central Nervous System RadiotherapyPediatric Radiation OncologyRadiation TherapyRadiobiological ConsiderationsWhole Brain RadiotherapyMedulloblastoma IrradiationMedulloblastoma RadiotherapyPediatric Cranial IrradiationPediatric Craniospinal IrradiationPediatric RadiotherapyProton Craniospinal IrradiationProton Therapy For MedulloblastomaTreatment Technique
PURPOSE: We report on a radiation treatment technique that has reduced the dose to critical normal structures in children with medulloblastoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three children between the ages of 3 and 4 with stage M2 or M3 medulloblastoma were treated between 2001 and 2003 with craniospinal irradiation using protons. Patients received 36 cobalt gray equivalent to the craniospinal axis, then 18 cobalt gray equivalent to the posterior fossa. The cranium was treated with opposed lateral fields. The spine was treated with three matched posteroanterior fields, with the beam stopping just beyond the thecal sac. The posterior fossa was then treated with alternating posteroanterior, right posterior oblique, and left posterior oblique fields, with the beam stopping just proximal to the cochlea. The use of general anesthesia and pre-porting with diagnostic-quality x-rays allowed precise patient positioning. RESULTS: Craniospinal irradiation delivered via conformal proton irradiation substantially reduced the dose to the cochlea and vertebral bodies and virtually eliminated the exit dose through thorax, abdomen, and pelvis. Despite concurrent chemotherapy, a clinically significant lymphocyte count reduction was not seen. Patients tolerated treatment well; acute side effects (e.g., nausea, decreased appetite, and odynophagia) were mild. All patients completed therapy without interruption. CONCLUSION: Our proton-beam technique for craniospinal irradiation of pediatric medulloblastoma has successfully reduced normal-tissue doses and acute treatment-related sequelae. This technique may be especially advantageous in children with a history of myelosuppression, who might not other wise tolerate irradiation.
23
Raymond Miralbell, Antony Lomax, Laura Cella et al. · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · 2002 · 409 citations
Electron beam dose calculations
Kenneth R. Hogstrom, Michael Mills, Peter R. Almond · Physics in Medicine and Biology · 1981 · 351 citations
J. Russell Geyer, Paul M. Zeltzer, James M. Boyett et al. · Journal of Clinical Oncology · 1994 · 241 citations
Medicine, Oncology, Pediatrics +16