Journal of Strategic Studies · 2012 · 86 citations · 48 references
Social SciencesInternational RelationsStrategyDiplomacyForeign Policy AnalysisInternational OrganizationsDiplomatic RelationsForeign PolicyInternational CooperationRussian Foreign PolicyBalancingCentral Asia PolicyEast Asian International RelationsForeign Policy PowersGreat Power Foreign PolicyNormative Foreign PolicySoft BalancingUnited States Foreign Policy
Abstract This article examines Chinese and Russian foreign policy and military strategy from the theoretical standpoint of soft balancing. Analysis of their thinking indicates that both seek to offset US military superiority without engaging American power directly. To that end, Chinese and Russian strategists have adopted ‘soft’ or ‘normative’ power assets as strategic capabilities in their military and foreign policy. Alternative norms, such as the concept of ‘sovereign democracy’, allow China and Russia to deliberately ignore human rights issues in order to achieve diplomatic advantage with respect to the United States. The two powers have institutionalized these norms within the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, which they use to counterbalance US interests in Central Asia.
48
Neoclassical Realism and Theories of Foreign Policy
Gideon Rose · World Politics · 1998 · 1.6K citations
Social Sciences, International Relations, Political Science +11
Barry Buzan · International Affairs · 1986 · 1.5K citations
Bound to lead: the changing nature of American power
Choice Reviews Online · 1990 · 1.3K citations
Structural Realism after the Cold War
Kenneth N. Waltz · International Security · 2000 · 1.3K citations
Social Sciences, International Relations, Political Science +11