Sibship Size and Intellectual Development: Is the Relationship Causal?

Guang Guo, Leah K. VanWey

American Sociological Review · 1999 · 249 citations · 28 references

Concepts

TL;DR

The study tests whether the effect of sibship size on child intellectual development is confounded by family influences by using sibling analysis and repeated measures of the same individuals. The authors employ change or fixed‑effects models on data from the U.S. National Longitudinal Survey of Youth to control for permanent family effects such as socioeconomic status, genetics, and home intellectual environment.

Abstract

In this study we test the alternative interpretation of the effect of sibship size on childs intellectual development through sibling analysis and analysis of repeated measures of the same individuals. Both analyses are variations of change models or fixed-effects models. Change models enable us to control permanent family effects including family socioeconomic status (SES) family genetic makeup and intellectual atmosphere in the home by `differencing them out. Thus we can determine if and how much the sibship-size effect is confounded by other family influences that are difficult or impossible to control in conventional regression analysis. The data are from the [U.S.] National Longitudinal Survey of Youth (NLSY). Also included are comments by Meredith Phillips (pp. 188-92) and D. B. Downey B. Powell L. C. Steelman and S. Pribesh (pp. 193-98) and a reply by Guo and VanWey (pp. 199-206). (EXCERPT)

References

28