Folia Primatologica · 1984 · 83 citations · 11 references
Life SciencesAnatomyZoologyComparative AnatomyHerpetologyMammalogyComparative Craniofacial AnatomyCranial EvolutionCraniofacial EvolutionDental AnatomyMaxillary AnatomyComparative Cranial MorphologyComparative Dental MorphologyComparative DentitionCranial Morphology EvolutionCranial Shape VariationCraniodental MorphologyMammalian Cranial AnatomyMammalian Cranial Morphology
A survey of craniodental variability of the three allopatric populations of Leontopithecus reveals that they are morphologically heterogeneous and individually distinctive, with a nonclinal distribution of characters and pattern similarities. These observations correspond with their better known, starkly different coat coloration, and imply important ecological-adaptive differences. Leontopithecus chrysomelas contrasts markedly in its robust physique, relatively massive and anatomically modified incisors, comparatively small cheek teeth and unique cranial shape. Leontopithecus rosalia is smallest and most gracile, with a highly abbreviated premaxilla and reduced anterior dentition. Leontopithecus chrysopygus is quite the largest in most bodily and cranial dimensions yet is more similar to Leontopithecus rosalia in anterior tooth size and proportions, and has a massively built face. Phyletically, Leontopithecus is most closely related to Callithrix (incl. Cebuella) among the callitrichines. Protection of their habitats is urged for there are three times as many species of endangered Lion Tamarins as we had thought.
11
James Dale Smith, J. R. Napier, P. H. Napier · Journal of Mammalogy · 1968 · 533 citations
Life Sciences, Biology, Zoology +13
Evolutionary history of the primates
Glenn C. Conroy · International Journal of Primatology · 1980 · 414 citations