Organization and development of brain stem auditory nuclei of the chicken: Tonotopic organization of N. magnocellularis and N. laminaris

Edwin W. Rubel, Thomas N. Parks

The Journal of Comparative Neurology · 1975 · 266 citations · 49 references

TL;DR

Extracellular recordings of tone‑burst responses in hatchling chickens were used to map the tonotopic organization of NM and NL, and quantitative procedures were developed to relate characteristic frequency to unit position within each nucleus. NM neurons form dorso‑ventral isofrequency columns with high CFs (~4.1 kHz) rostromedially and lower CFs caudally and laterally, while NL neurons receive polarized, binaural excitatory input and exhibit a matching tonotopic map; quantitative analyses account for 79 % of NM and 89 % of NL frequency variance by predicting CF from position.

Abstract

Abstract Extracellular recordings of responses to tone‐burst stimulation were used to determine the tonotopic organization of n. magnocellularis (NM) and n. laminaris (NL) in hatchling chickens. NM cells show “primary‐like” response patterns to ipsilateral stimulation, and are arranged in dorso‐ventral isofrequency columns. Units responding to the highest frequency tones (about 4,100 Hz) are situated at the rostromedial pole of the medial division. Units with lower characteristic frequencies (CF's) are found at successively caudal and lateral sites, until extremely low CF's (<500 Hz) are represented dorsoventrally in the caudolateral tail of the lateral division. No evidence was found of auditory input to the region which receives projections from the macula lagena. NL receives polarized, binaural, excitatory input. Units have similar CF's and thresholds to tones presented to either ear. The tonotopic organization in NL matches that found in NM — high CF's rostromedially and low CF's caudal and lateral. Quantitative procedures were developed for relating CF to the position of a unit within either nucleus. These analyses account for 79% and 89% of the frequency variance found within NM and NL, respectively, and predict the CF of a neuron by its position within each nucleus.

References

49