Environmental Regulation and U.S. Economic Growth

Dale W. Jorgenson, Peter J. Wilcoxen

The RAND Journal of Economics · 1990 · 619 citations · 14 references

Concepts

TL;DR

The study does not assess environmental benefits, focusing solely on cost implications. The article aims to quantify pollution control costs by simulating U.S. economic growth with and without regulation. The authors built a detailed macroeconomic model incorporating long‑term growth determinants and industry interactions to simulate regulatory impacts.

Abstract

In this article we quantify the costs of pollution controls by reporting the results of simulations of the growth of the U.S. economy with and without regulation. For this purpose, we have constructed a detailed model of the economy that includes the determinants of long-term growth. We have also analyzed the interaction between industries in order to capture the full repercussions of environmental regulations. However, we have not attempted to assess the benefits resulting from a cleaner environment. We find that pollution abatement has emerged as a major claimant on the resources of the U.S. economy. The cost of emission controls is more than 10% of the total cost of government purchases of goods and services.

References

14