Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care · 2007 · 41 citations · 20 references
MedicineClinical SciencesFamily MedicinePrimary CarePulmonary Function TestingPulmonologyChronic Care ManagementChronic Obstructive Pulmonary DiseaseChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease CareObstructive Lung DiseasePulmonary Function AssessmentCare Process EvaluationIntegrated Care TeamsLung DiseasesLung Function TestingPatient Outcome EvaluationPatient Outcome MeasurementPatient Outcomes MeasurementRespiratory Disease Management
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of a primary care model for COPD on process of care and patient outcome. DESIGN: Controlled study with delayed intervention in control group. SETTING: The GP delegates tasks to a COPD support service (CSS) and a practice nurse. The CSS offers logistic support to the practice through a patient register and recall system for annual history-taking and lung function measurement. It also forms the link with the chest physician for diagnostic and therapeutic advice. The practice nurse's most important tasks are education and counselling. SUBJECTS: A total of 44 practices (n =22 for intervention and n =22 for control group) and 260 of their patients > or = 40 years with obstructive lung diseases. RESULTS: Within the intervention group planned visits increased from 16% to 44% and from 19% to 25% in the control condition (difference between groups p =0.014). Annual lung function measurement rose from 17% to 67% in the intervention and from 11% to 18% in the control group (difference between groups p =0.001). Compared with control, more but not statistically significant smokers received periodic advice to quit smoking (p =0.16). At baseline 41% of the intervention group were using their inhalers correctly and this increased to 54% after two years; it decreased in the control group from 47 to 29% (difference between groups p =0.002). The percentage of patients without exacerbation did not change significantly compared with the control condition. The percentage of the intervention group not needing emergency medication rose from 79% to 84% but decreased in the controls from 81 to 76% (difference between groups p =0.08). CONCLUSION: Combining different disciplines in one model has a positive effect on compliance with recommendations for monitoring patients, and improves the care process and some patient outcomes.
20
Improving Primary Care for Patients With Chronic Illness
Thomas Bodenheimer · JAMA · 2002 · 3K citations
Lotte Steuten, Eva C. Creutzberg, Hubertus JM Vrijhoef et al. · Primary Care Respiratory Journal · 2005 · 183 citations · Full text