Critical Care Medicine · 1987 · 19 citations · 0 references
MedicineClinical SciencesInternal MedicinePulmonologyRisk AssessmentSepsisAcute Lung InjuryAcute Respiratory Distress SyndromePulmonary AssessmentPulmonary ImagingRespiratory DiseaseRespiratory Distress SyndromeAcute Respiratory Distress Syndrome AssessmentAdult Respiratory Distress SyndromeClinical Risk PredictionClinical Risk ScoringPulmonary Capillary PermeabilityPulmonary PermeabilityPulmonary Risk EvaluationRespiratory Distress Scoring
Two methods for predicting adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) were evaluated prospectively in a group of 81 multitrauma and sepsis patients considered at clinical high risk. A popular ARDS risk-scoring method, employing discriminant analysis equations (weighted risk criteria and oxygenation characteristics), yielded a predictive accuracy of 59% and a false-negative rate of 22%. Pulmonary alveolar-capillary permeability (PACP) was determined with a radioaerosol lung-scan technique in 23 of these 81 patients, representing a statistically similar subgroup. Lung scanning achieved a predictive accuracy of 71% (after excluding patients with unilateral pulmonary contusion) and gave no false-negatives. We propose a combination of clinical risk identification and functional determination of PACP to assess a patient's risk of developing ARDS.