Postoperative UFT Adjuvant and the Risk Factors for Recurrence in Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Long‐Term Follow‐Up Study

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Radical nephrectomy is the standard therapy for low-stage renal cell carcinoma. However, recurrence sometimes develops even in patients who are considered to have undergone a curative resection of the primary tumor. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of UFT (a 1:4 mixture of tegafur and uracil) adjuvant and the risk factors for recurrence in renal cell carcinoma. METHODS: A prospective randomized trial was conducted to compare the use of long-term oral UFT adjuvant with nonadjuvant therapy after a radical nephrectomy for Robson stage I or II renal cell carcinoma. A multivariate analysis was also performed to estimate the risk factors for recurrence. RESULTS: A total of 71 patients were entered into this study, and 66 were evaluable (33 for each group). There was no significant difference in patient characteristics between the 2 groups. The nonrecurrence rate at 5 years after a radical nephrectomy was 80.5% and 77.1% in the UFT adjuvant group and the nonadjuvant group, respectively, with a median follow-up of 112.9 months; the difference was not significant. The toxicity of UFT was generally mild and tolerable. The tumor grade was found to be an important factor influencing recurrence. CONCLUSION: UFT cannot be universally recommended as an adjuvant therapy for radical nephrectomy in all patients with low-stage renal cell carcinoma.