Journal of Experimental Psychology General · 1998 · 560 citations · 63 references
Social SciencesBehavioral SciencesPsychologyCognitive PsychologyExperimental PsychologyKnowledge RepresentationClassificationCognitive ModelingConcept FormationExplanationPattern RecognitionRule-based RepresentationCategorization ModelsCategory GeneralizationCategory InductionCategory LearningPerceptual CategorizationRule-based CategorizationRule-based ExplanationsRule-exception Learning
Psychological theories of categorization generally focus on either rule- or exemplar-based explanations. We present 2 experiments that show evidence of both rule induction and exemplar encoding as well as a connectionist model, ATRIUM, that specifies a mechanism for combining rule- and exemplar-based representation. In 2 experiments participants learned to classify items, most of which followed a simple rule, although there were a few frequently occurring exceptions. Experiment 1 examined how people extrapolate beyond the range of training. Experiment 2 examined the effect of instance frequency on generalization. Categorization behavior was well described by the model, in which exemplar representation is used for both rule and exception processing. A key element in correctly modeling these results was capturing the interaction between the rule- and exemplar-based representations by using shifts of attention between rules and exemplars.
63
Adaptive Mixtures of Local Experts
Robert A. Jacobs, Michael I. Jordan, Steven J. Nowlan et al. · Neural Computation · 1991 · 5K citations
The empirical case for two systems of reasoning.
Steven A. Sloman · Psychological Bulletin · 1996 · 3.7K citations