American Journal of Roentgenology · 1985 · 39 citations · 3 references
MedicineRadiologyDiagnostic ImagingDiagnostic RadiologyRadiographic AnatomyComputed TomographySpinal AnatomySpinal AssessmentSpinal ExaminationSpine ImagingInterobserver ReproducibilityLumbar Foraminal StenosisLumbar Spine ImagingRadiographic Spinal AssessmentSpinal Stenosis Assessment
Lumbar spine computed tomographic (CT) scans of 10 patients were examined independently at two levels by five experienced radiologists. At each level the minimum midline sagittal diameter was measured, and at each intervertebral space the left foramen was measured for its minimum diameter. Statistically significant differences were found between the measurements of different observers, differences that in a number of cases could have led to disagreement over whether or not stenosis was present. There were reasonably strong correlations between different observers' readings of midline sagittal diameters but generally not of foraminal diameters. Reasons for discrepancies between observers in spine CT measurements are reviewed briefly.
3
Ivan Ćirić, Michael A. Mikhael, Joseph A. Tarkington et al. · Journal of neurosurgery · 1980 · 158 citations
Computed Tomography of the Spine
Victor M. Haughton, Alan L. Williams · Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography · 1982 · 82 citations
Computed tomography of the lumbar spine.
Neil Chafetz, Harry K. Genant · PubMed · 1983 · 13 citations