A novel cardiopulmonary exercise test protocol and criterion to determine maximal oxygen uptake in chronic heart failure

Abstract

Cardiopulmonary exercise testing for peak oxygen uptake (Vo(2peak)) can evaluate prognosis in chronic heart failure (CHF) patients, with the peak respiratory exchange ratio (RER(peak)) commonly used to confirm maximal effort and maximal oxygen uptake (Vo(2max)). We determined the precision of RER(peak) in confirming Vo(2max), and whether a novel ramp-incremental (RI) step-exercise (SE) (RISE) test could better determine Vo(2max) in CHF. Male CHF patients (n = 24; NYHA class I-III) performed a symptom-limited RISE-95 cycle ergometer test in the format: RI (4-18 W/min; ∼10 min); 5 min recovery (10 W); SE (95% peak RI work rate). Patients (n = 18) then performed RISE-95 tests using slow (3-8 W/min; ∼15 min) and fast (10-30 W/min; ∼6 min) ramp rates. Pulmonary gas exchange was measured breath-by-breath. Vo(2peak) was compared within patients by unpaired t-test of the highest 12 breaths during RI and SE phases to confirm Vo(2max) and its 95% confidence limits (CI(95)). RER(peak) was significantly influenced by ramp rate (fast, medium, slow: 1.21 ± 0.1 vs. 1.15 ± 0.1 vs. 1.09 ± 0.1; P = 0.001), unlike Vo(2peak) (mean n = 18; 14.4 ± 2.6 ml·kg(-1)·min(-1); P = 0.476). Group Vo(2peak) was similar between RI and SE (n = 24; 14.5 ± 3.0 vs. 14.7 ± 3.1 ml·kg(-1)·min(-1); P = 0.407); however, within-subject comparisons confirmed Vo(2max) in only 14 of 24 patients (CI(95) for Vo(2max) estimation averaged 1.4 ± 0.8 ml·kg(-1)·min(-1)). The RER(peak) in CHF was significantly influenced by ramp rate, suggesting its use to determine maximal effort and Vo(2max) be abandoned. In contrast, the RISE-95 test had high precision for Vo(2max) confirmation with patient-specific CI(95) (without secondary criteria), and showed that Vo(2max) is commonly underestimated in CHF. The RISE-95 test was well tolerated by CHF patients, supporting its use for Vo(2max) confirmation.