Classification of Peripheral and Central (Pontine Infarction) Vestibular Deficits: Selection of a Neuro-otological Test Battery Using Discriminant Analysis

Abstract

The results obtained from a complete neuro-otological test battery were examined statistically in order to select measurement variables which would optimally indicate significant differences between four groups: normal patients, patients with partially compensated unilateral peripheral vestibular deficit, patients with an acoustic neurinoma and patients with central (brainstem) vestibular deficit. A stepwise-discriminant analysis was performed on measurements of slow-phase velocity obtained from each test. The primary measurements selected to assign a subject optimally to one population were the canal paresis (CP) of the caloric test, the eye-tracking gain contralateral to the deficit for a 15 deg/s stimulus, the gain asymmetry for optokinetic nystagmus with a 30 deg/s stimulus, and the level of spontaneous nystagmus. The resulting classifications were 100% correct for normal and central deficit patients. However, the division between peripheral deficit and acoustic neurinoma patients overlapped causing about 30% false classifications of neurinoma patients: some 20% of the peripheral deficit patients were classified as normal. If the CP was not available the discriminant analysis substituted the rotating chair response for 5 deg/s2, in place of CP. This substitution caused a 10 to 20% decrease in classification accuracy.