International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism · 2009 · 163 citations · 17 references
Language StudiesLinguisticsTeachingBilingual EducationLanguage EducationLanguage PolicyBilingual Education PolicyLanguage Education PolicyLanguage Policy In EducationLinguistically Responsive InstructionMultilingual EducationMultilingualismBilingual Classroom InteractionBilingualism In The ClassroomCode-switching In EducationCode-switching In SchoolingCode-switching In The ClassroomLanguage Ideologies In EducationLearner Language ProficiencyStudent Language Proficiency
Monolingualism dominates society, leading minority ethnic communities in Britain to favor replacing English with other languages, while complementary schools often enforce One Language Only or One Language at a Time policies, despite widespread fear of bilingual practices such as codeswitching. This study investigates how Chinese–English bilingual children use codeswitching as a symbolic and creative resource, focusing on tensions between school ideologies and policies and the actual practices of teachers and pupils, as well as differences in language proficiency and preference. Using examples from a large research project, the authors illustrate how pupils employ codeswitching to resist OLON and OLAT policies, manipulate language proficiency to undermine teacher authority, and strategically push and break boundaries between old and new, conventional and original, and acceptable and challenging.
Abstract The ideology of monolingualism prevails throughout society, including within minority ethnic communities who are bilingual and multilingual. Some minority ethnic communities in Britain believe that the response to the dominance of English language is to replace it with other languages. Complementary schools – language and culture calsses organised by minority ethnic communities – often impose a One Language Only (OLON) or One Language at a Time (OLAT) policy. There is still widespread fear of bilingual and multilingual practices such as codeswitching. Drawing on data from a large research project on multilingual practices in complementary schools, this paper examines the use of codeswitching by Chinese–English bilingual children as a symbolic and creative resource. A particular focus is on the tensions between the school ideologies and policies and the actual practices by the teachers and pupils, as well as the differences between the teachers and pupils' language proficiencies and preferences. Examples of codeswitching will be used to show how the pupils resist the OLON and OLAT policies; how they manipulate their language proficiency to undermine the teachers' authority and gain control of classroom interaction; and how they use codeswitching creatively and strategically to push and break the boundaries between the old and the new, the conventional and the original, and the acceptable and the challenging.
17
Rosalind Chambers, Elizabeth Bott · British Journal of Sociology · 1958 · 1K citations
Petr Najvar, Josef Maňák, Tomáš Janík · 2004 · 816 citations