Publication | Closed Access
Comparative study of anthropometric measurements of the same subjects in two different institutes
21
Citations
4
References
1974
Year
Physical ActivityMeasurementSkeletal MeasurementsTopographical AnatomyAnthropometric IndicatorOrthopaedic SurgerySystematic DifferencesDifferent InstitutesGross AnatomyKinesiologyBody CompositionApplied MeasurementApplied PhysiologyBiostatisticsHealth SciencesPhysical MedicineMusculoskeletal ImagingAllometric StudyComparative StudyGirth MeasurementsBody SizeMedicineSkeletal ImagingSame Subjects
Abstract The objectivity of several anthropometric measurements were tested in two institutes on the same subjects. In many cases systematic differences are to be expected: 1. Girth measurements tend to differences in the same direction. 2. The comparability of skeletal measurements is often uncertain; some measurements tend to give lower, other ones higher figures. Biacromial diameter and radio‐ulnar epicondylar width do not reveal systematic differences. 3. Skinfold thicknesses measured do not reveal systematic differences.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1