Journal of Functional Biomaterials · 2014 · 15 citations · 33 references
DentistryDental Biomaterials ScienceImplant DentistryDental MaterialsImplant SurgerySurface Properties Of Dental MaterialsBone Quality AssessmentImplant BiomechanicsImplant DesignOsseointegration MonitoringSurface Modification Of ImplantsBiocompatibility Of Dental ImplantsBiomechanics Of Dental ImplantsBone-implant Contact AssessmentDental ImplantsNew Bone FormationOsseointegration PromotionRemoval TorqueTorque
The aim of the present study was to evaluate a new multi-phosphonate surface treatment (SurfLink®) in an unloaded sheep model. Treated implants were compared to control implants in terms of bone to implant contact (BIC), bone formation, and biomechanical stability. The study used two types of implants (rough or machined surface finish) each with either the multi-phosphonate Wet or Dry treatment or no treatment (control) for a total of six groups. Animals were sacrificed after 2, 8, and 52 weeks. No adverse events were observed at any time point. At two weeks, removal torque showed significantly higher values for the multi-phosphonate treated rough surface (+32% and +29%, Dry and Wet, respectively) compared to rough control. At 52 weeks, a significantly higher removal torque was observed for the multi-phosphonate treated machined surfaces (+37% and 23%, Dry and Wet, respectively). The multi-phosphonate treated groups showed a positive tendency for higher BIC with time and increased new-old bone ratio at eight weeks. SEM images revealed greater amounts of organic materials on the multi-phosphonate treated compared to control implants, with the bone fracture (from the torque test) appearing within the bone rather than at the bone to implant interface as it occurred for control implants.
33
T. Albrektsson, Evert Dahl, Lars Enbom et al. · Journal of Periodontology · 1988 · 597 citations
Daniel Buser, Thomas Nydegger, Thomas R. Oxland et al. · Journal of Biomedical Materials Research · 1999 · 454 citations