Radiologia Brasileira · 2013 · 14 citations · 14 references
MedicineOncologyRadiologyDiagnostic ImagingDiagnostic PathologyDiagnostic RadiologyBreast Cancer ImagingBreast ImagingBreast PathologyBreast SurgeryCancer DetectionCancer DiagnosisBi-rads ClassificationBreast Imaging FindingsBreast Imaging Pathology CorrelationBreast Lesion DiagnosisBreast Pathology ReportingPositive Predictive ValuePositive Predictive Value AnalysisPositive Predictive Value Estimation
Objective To evaluate the BI-RADS as a predictive factor of suspicion for malignancy in breast lesions by correlating radiological with histological results and calculating the positive predictive value for categories 3, 4 and 5 in a breast cancer reference center in the city of São Paulo. Materials and Methods Retrospective, analytical and cross-sectional study including 725 patients with mammographic and/or sonographic findings classified as BI-RADS categories 3, 4 and 5 who were referred to the authors' institution to undergo percutaneous biopsy. The tests results were reviewed and the positive predictive value was calculated by means of a specific mathematical equation. Results Positive predictive values found for categories 3, 4 and 5 were respectively the following: 0.74%, 33.08% and 92.95%, for cases submitted to ultrasound-guided biopsy, and 0.00%, 14.90% and 100% for cases submitted to stereotactic biopsy. Conclusion The present study demonstrated high suspicion for malignancy in lesions classified as category 5 and low risk for category 3. As regards category 4, the need for systematic biopsies was observed.
14
Solid breast nodules: use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions.
A. Thomas Stavros, David Thickman, Cindy Rapp et al. · Radiology · 1995 · 1.8K citations
BI-RADS Categorization As a Predictor of Malignancy
Susan G. Orel, Nicole Kay, Carol Reynolds et al. · Radiology · 1999 · 390 citations