Concepedia

Publication | Closed Access

Comparison of Shear-Wave and Strain Ultrasound Elastography in the Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions

194

Citations

33

References

2013

Year

TLDR

The study compares the diagnostic performance of shear‑wave and strain elastography for distinguishing benign from malignant breast lesions. The authors evaluated 150 breast lesions with B‑mode ultrasound, shear‑wave, and strain elastography, recording BI‑RADs scores, elasticity values in kilopascals, and 5‑point elasticity scores, and assessed diagnostic accuracy using ROC AUC. Shear‑wave and strain elastography had similar AUCs (0.928 vs 0.943) and both improved accuracy when combined with B‑mode ultrasound (AUC up to 0.965), with shear‑wave showing higher sensitivity and strain higher specificity, though performance varied by tumor grade and breast thickness.

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to compare the diagnostic performances of shearwave and strain elastography for the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions.B-mode ultrasound and shear-wave and strain elastography were performed in 150 breast lesions; 71 were malignant. BI-RADS final assessment, elasticity values in kilopascals, and elasticity scores on a 5-point scale were assessed before biopsy. The results were compared using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).The AUC for shear-wave elastography was similar to that of strain elastography (0.928 vs 0.943). The combined use of B-mode ultrasound and either elastography technique improved diagnostic performance in the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions compared with the use of B-mode ultrasound alone (B-mode alone, AUC = 0.851; B-mode plus shear-wave elastography, AUC = 0.964; B-mode plus strain elastography, AUC = 0.965; p < 0.001). With the best cutoff points of 80 kPa on shear-wave elastography and a score between 3 and 4 on strain elastography, the sensitivity was higher in shear-wave elastography, and specificity was higher in strain elastography (95.8% vs 81.7%, p = 0.002; 93.7% vs 84.8%, p = 0.016). In cases of infiltrating ductal carcinoma, mean elasticity scores were lower in grade 3 than in grade 1 and 2 cancers (p = 0.017) with strain elastography causing false-negative findings.The diagnostic performance of shear-wave and strain elastography was similar. Either elastography technique can improve overall diagnostic performance in the differentiation of benign and malignant lesions when combined with B-mode ultrasound. However, the sensitivity and specificity of shear-wave and strain elastography were different according to lesion histologic profile, tumor grade, and breast thickness.

References

YearCitations

Page 1