Polymer Composites · 1996 · 117 citations · 7 references
EngineeringMaterials EngineeringMaterials ScienceMaterials CharacterizationMechanical Behavior Of MaterialsStructural MaterialsFlow MeasurementFluid PropertiesPermeability AnalysisPermeability AssessmentPermeability CharacterizationPermeability EvaluationAnisotropic PermeabilityInjection PressureMold PermeabilityPermeability TensorRadial FlowReference Material CharacterizationViscosityViscosity Measurement
Abstract Three of the most common methods (two with parallel flow and one with radial flow) for determination of the in‐plane permeability tensor are studied both theoretically and experimentally. An error analysis shows that the difference between the methods is negligible if the error levels are equal. However, the radial flow method is found to be susceptible to large errors from mold deflection in an experimental comparison between the methods. Additional experiments with the radial flow method in a stiffer mold show that the method gives the same values for the permeability tensor as the other two methods. A new method with multiple cavities in parallel is proposed that combines the simplicity of the radial flow method with the stiff mold of the parallel flow method. Only mass and time need to be measured in one experiment and it eliminates the need to measure fluid viscosity, temperature, and injection pressure. The method depends on the availability of a reference material with known permeability.
7
Flow of fluids through porous materials
Robert A. Baker · Journal of the Franklin Institute · 1961 · 762 citations
Consolidation Experiments for Laminate Composites
Timothy G. Gutowski, Zhongya Cai, Sebastian Bauer et al. · Journal of Composite Materials · 1987 · 447 citations
Natural Sciences, Materials Engineering, Materials Science +17