Barriers to Informed Consent

Charles W. Lidz

Annals of Internal Medicine · 1983 · 136 citations · 6 references

Concepts

TL;DR

The law of informed consent aims to involve patients in decision‑making, yet authorities disagree on why this participation is lacking, attributing it either to patient incapacity or insufficient physician explanation. Observations revealed multiple barriers to patient participation, including protracted decision timelines, numerous concurrent choices, patients’ belief that decisions belong to physicians, physicians’ lack of understanding of patient roles, and a fragmented decision‑making team that obscures responsibility.

Abstract

The law of informed consent seeks to actively involve patients in decision making. Most authorities agree that this involvement has not occurred but disagree about why. Some suggest that patients are incapable of understanding medical issues and others that physicians have not explained issues clearly or extensively enough. We observed decision making in several hospital settings and found other significant barriers to patient participation. These barriers include the fact that treatment decisions take place over a long period; there are often many decisions to be made; although patients want information about treatment, they typically believe that decision making is the physician's task; physicians do not understand the rationale for the patient's role in decisions; and the medical decision-making process often involves so many people that the patient does not know who is responsible.

References

6