Hepatitis B Vaccination in HIV-Infected Youth: A Randomized Trial of Three Regimens

Patricia M. Flynn, Coleen K. Cunningham, Bret J. Rudy, Craig M. Wilson, Bill G. Kapogiannis, Carol Worrell, James Bethel, Dina Monte, Kelly Bojan

JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes · 2011 · 46 citations · 36 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

Abstract

BACKGROUND: HIV-infected youth are at risk of hepatitis B infection and should be vaccinated. Previous reports suggest reduced response to standard hepatitis B vaccine regimens. METHODS: HIV-infected youth, aged 12 to younger than 25 years, were randomly assigned to one of three treatment arms: Arm 1: Engerix B, 20 μg HBsAg; Arm 2: Engerix B (GlaxoSmithKline, Rixensart, Belgium), 40 μg; and Arm 3: Twinrix (GlaxoSmithKline, Rixensart, Belgium), 20 μg HBsAg combined with 720 ELU hepatitis A antigen. Vaccines were administered at Weeks 0, 4, and 24. RESULTS: Characteristics of evaluable patients (n = 336) at entry were similar in the study arms. At enrollment, median CD4+ T-cell count was 460 cells/mm3 (interquartile range, 305-668); 13% were less than 200 cells/mm3. Among Engerix B, 20-μg recipients, 60.4% responded to vaccine (HBsAb 10 IU/mL or greater at Week 28). Improved vaccine response was seen in recipients of Engerix B, 40 μg (73.2% versus Arm 1, P = 0.04) and Twinrix (75.4% versus Arm 1, P = 0.02). In multivariate analysis, only baseline CD4+ T-cell count and study arm were independent predictors of vaccine response. CONCLUSIONS: In HIV-infected youth, a three-dose vaccination regimen with Engerix B, 40 μg, or Twinrix and higher baseline CD4+ T-cell counts were independently associated with improved vaccine response.

References

36