The Credit-to-GDP Gap and Countercyclical Capital Buffers: Questions and Answers

Mathias Drehmann, Kostas Tsatsaronis

SSRN Electronic Journal · 2014 · 178 citations · 3 references

Full text

Open access

Concepts

TL;DR

Basel III uses the credit‑to‑GDP gap as a guide for countercyclical capital buffers, but critics question its suitability, early‑warning properties, and measurement, and some misinterpret its intended role. The authors argue that the gap should inform, not dictate, supervisory judgment on countercyclical buffer levels. Across many countries and crises, the credit‑to‑GDP gap reliably signals financial vulnerability build‑up.

Abstract

Basel III uses the gap between the credit-to-GDP ratio and its long-term trend as a guide for setting countercyclical capital buffers. Criticism of this choice centres on three areas: (i) the suitability of the guide given the objective of the buffer; (ii) the early warning indicator properties of the guide for banking crises (especially for emerging market economies); and (iii) practical measurement problems. While many criticisms have merit, some misinterpret the objective of the instrument and the role of the indicator. Historically, for a large cross section of countries and crisis episodes, the credit-to-GDP gap is a robust single indicator for the build-up of financial vulnerabilities. As such, its role is to inform, rather than dictate, supervisors’ judgmental decisions regarding the appropriate level of the countercyclical buffer.

References

3