The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2003 · 53 citations · 19 references
Health ProfessionsAudiologyPhysiologyHearing AssessmentHearing ScienceSensory PhysiologyAuditory Brainstem Response TestingAuditory Brainstem ResponsesAuditory PhysiologyAuditory ThresholdsHearing SensitivityHearing Threshold EstimationAuditory Brainstem Response Threshold EstimationAuditory ResponseBandwidthBehavioral Hearing ThresholdsHearing Sensitivity MeasurementHearing Threshold MeasurementSensitivityThresholds
Auditory brainstem response (ABR) and standard behavioral methods were compared by measuring in-air audiograms for an adult female harbor seal (Phoca vitulina). Behavioral audiograms were obtained using two techniques: the method of constant stimuli and the staircase method. Sensitivity was tested from 0.250 to 30 kHz. The seal showed good sensitivity from 6 to 12 kHz [best sensitivity 8.1 dB (re 20 microPa2 x s) RMS at 8 kHz]. The staircase method yielded thresholds that were lower by 10 dB on average than the method of constant stimuli. ABRs were recorded at 2, 4, 8, 16, and 22 kHz and showed a similar best range (8-16 kHz). ABR thresholds averaged 5.7 dB higher than behavioral thresholds at 2, 4, and 8 kHz. ABRs were at least 7 dB lower at 16 kHz, and approximately 3 dB higher at 22 kHz. The better sensitivity of ABRs at higher frequencies could have reflected differences in the seal's behavior during ABR testing and/or bandwidth characteristics of test stimuli. These results agree with comparisons of ABR and behavioral methods performed in other recent studies and indicate that ABR methods represent a good alternative for estimating hearing range and sensitivity in pinnipeds, particularly when time is a critical factor and animals are untrained.
19