In Vivo Quantification of Capsular End Point in the Nonimpaired Glenohumeral Joint Using an Instrumented Measurement System

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN: Single-group factorial. OBJECTIVES: Quantify glenohumeral joint translations as a function of force using an instrumented measurement system. Our first specific aim was to compare the magnitude of force (N) required to reach capsular end-point between the anterior, posterior, and inferior directions. Our second specific aim was to compare the magnitude of translation (mm) at capsular end-point between the anterior, posterior, and inferior directions. BACKGROUND: Manual force-displacement techniques are subjective in nature, and the clinician must rely on "feel" to determine capsular end-point. Several investigators have attempted to utilize more objective measures at the glenohumeral joint, however none have quantified the force or displacements necessary to achieve a true capsular end-point. METHODS AND MEASURES: An arthrometric technique was used to measure anterior, posterior, and inferior glenohumeral translations in 20 nonimpaired shoulders (11 women and 9 men with a mean age of 20.9 +/- 3.6 years). RESULTS: The magnitude of applied force required to reach capsular end-point was significantly different between directions of translations. Anterior-directed translations required a significantly greater magnitude of applied force to reach capsular end-point than inferior-directed translations. The magnitude of translation was not significantly different between directions at capsular end-point. CONCLUSIONS: Applied forces in the range of 181 to 203 N are necessary to reach capsular end-point in subjects with nonimpaired shoulders. Anterior translation required significantly higher forces (203.1 +/- 13.1 N) to reach capsular end-point than inferior translation (181.4 +/- 31.9 N).