Randomized clinical trial to determine the effect of nasogastric drainage on tracheal acid aspiration following oesophagectomy

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate tracheal acid aspiration after oesophagectomy and to determine whether it is influenced by nasogastric (NG) drainage. METHODS: Thirty-four patients undergoing oesophagectomy were randomized to one of three methods of NG drainage: a single-lumen tube with free drainage and 4-hourly aspiration, a sump-type tube on continuous suction drainage, or no NG tube. A tracheal pH probe was used to collect information on acid aspiration for 48 h after surgery. A pH < 5.5 was considered abnormal (normal pH 6.8-7.2). Total time with tracheal pH < 5.5, number of reflux episodes and longest reflux time were compared between groups. RESULTS: There was significant and persistent tracheal acid aspiration in all patients. Patients with a sump-type tube had a significantly shorter total time with tracheal pH < 5.5 than those in the other groups (sump-type tube versus single-lumen tube, P = 0.0069; sump-type tube versus no tube, P = 0.0071). Patients randomized to no NG tube experienced more respiratory complications after surgery than those who had either single-lumen or sump-type tubes (seven of 12 versus four of 22 patients; P = 0.023). Insertion of a NG tube was necessary in the first week after surgery in seven of 12 patients in this group. CONCLUSION: Routine NG drainage after oesophagectomy is necessary. A sump-type NG tube is better at preventing tracheal acid aspiration and may reduce the incidence of respiratory complications.