Pharmaceutics · 2014 · 18 citations · 22 references
PharmacyPharmaceuticsPharmacologyDissolution TestingDrug DeliveryPharmaceutical FormulationDissolution MediaDrug DissolutionDrug SolubilityIn Vitro Dissolution TestingSolid-state CharacterizationTablet DesignCompaction PressureDissolution KineticsDissolution Of Amorphous DrugsDissolution Rate DeterminationDrug Dissolution KineticsPowder Diffraction AnalysisSolubility DeterminationSurface Properties
New drug candidates increasingly tend to be poorly water soluble. One approach to increase their solubility is to convert the crystalline form of a drug into the amorphous form. Intrinsic dissolution testing is an efficient standard method to determine the intrinsic dissolution rate (IDR) of a drug and to test the potential dissolution advantage of the amorphous form. However, neither the United States Pharmacopeia (USP) nor the European Pharmacopeia (Ph.Eur) state specific limitations for the compression pressure in order to obtain compacts for the IDR determination. In this study, the influence of different compression pressures on the IDR was determined from powder compacts of amorphous (ball-milling) indomethacin (IND), a glass solution of IND and poly(vinylpyrrolidone) (PVP) and crystalline IND. Solid state properties were analyzed with X-ray powder diffraction (XRPD) and the final compacts were visually observed to study the effects of compaction pressure on their surface properties. It was found that there is no significant correlation between IDR and compression pressure for crystalline IND and IND-PVP. This was in line with the observation of similar surface properties of the compacts. However, compression pressure had an impact on the IDR of pure amorphous IND compacts. Above a critical compression pressure, amorphous particles sintered to form a single compact with dissolution properties similar to quench-cooled disc and crystalline IND compacts. In such a case, the apparent dissolution advantage of the amorphous form might be underestimated. It is thus suggested that for a reasonable interpretation of the IDR, surface properties of the different analyzed samples should be investigated and for amorphous samples the IDR should be measured also as a function of the compression pressure used to prepare the solid sample for IDR testing.
22
Takahiro Matsumoto, George Zografi · Pharmaceutical Research · 1999 · 417 citations
María V. Velasco, James L. Ford, Philip Rowe et al. · Journal of Controlled Release · 1999 · 222 citations
Yukio Aso, Sumie Yoshioka, Shigeo Kojima · Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences · 2003 · 153 citations