Lymphatic Research and Biology · 2010 · 108 citations · 22 references
MedicineOncologyRadiologyBreast OncologyDiagnostic ImagingDiagnostic RadiologyBreast AssessmentBreast Cancer-related LymphedemaBreast ImagingBreast Cancer-related Lymphedema DiagnosisBreast MeasurementsDisplacementDual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry AssessmentWater Displacement Volumetry
BACKGROUND: Following treatment for breast cancer 12%-60% develop breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL). There are several ways of assessing BCRL. Circumference measurement (CM) and water displacement (WD) for volume measurements (VM) are frequently used methods in practice and research, respectively. The aim of this study was to evaluate CM and WD for VM of the BCRL arm and the contralateral arm, comparing the results with regional dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty-four women with unilateral BCRL were included in the study. Blinded duplicate VM were obtained from both arms using the three methods mentioned above. CM and DXA were performed by two observers. WD was performed by a group of observers. Mean differences (d) in duplicated volumes, limits of agreement (LOA), and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for each method. The repeatability expressed as d (95% CI) between the duplicated VM of the BCRL arm and the contralateral arm was for DXA 3 ml (-6-11) and 3 ml (1-7), respectively. For CM and WD, the d (95% CI) of the BCRL arm were 107 ml (86-127) and 26 ml (-26-79), respectively and in the contralateral arm 100 ml (78-122) and -6 ml (-29-17), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: DXA is superior in repeatability when compared to CM and WD for VM, especially for the BCRL arm but also the contralateral arm.
22
A H BECKETT, M ROWLAND, P TURNER · The Lancet · 1965 · 16.9K citations
Reliability and Validity of Arm Volume Measurements for Assessment of Lymphedema
Richard Taylor, Upali W Jayasinghe, Louise Koelmeyer et al. · Physical Therapy · 2006 · 329 citations · Full text