Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine · 2014 · 255 citations · 47 references
PharmacyInfectious Disease ControlInfectious DiseasesAntimicrobial StewardshipInfection PreventionBacterial InfectionsGuideline DevelopmentGuideline ImplementationHealthcare-associated Infection PreventionHospital Antimicrobial StewardshipInfection ManagementGuideline Development For ProphylaxisHospital Infection PreventionIncidence Of Hospital Infections
These guidelines, written for clinicians, contains evidence-based recommendations for the prevention of hospital acquired infections Hospital acquired infections are a major cause of mortality and morbidity and provide challenge to clinicians. Measures of infection control include identifying patients at risk of nosocomial infections, observing hand hygiene, following standard precautions to reduce transmission and strategies to reduce VAP, CR-BSI, CAUTI. Environmental factors and architectural lay out also need to be emphasized upon. Infection prevention in special subsets of patients - burns patients, include identifying sources of organism, identification of organisms, isolation if required, antibiotic prophylaxis to be used selectively, early removal of necrotic tissue, prevention of tetanus, early nutrition and surveillance. Immunodeficient and Transplant recipients are at a higher risk of opportunistic infections. The post tranplant timetable is divided into three time periods for determining risk of infections. Room ventilation, cleaning and decontamination, protective clothing with care regarding food requires special consideration. Monitoring and Surveillance are prioritized depending upon the needs. Designated infection control teams should supervise the process and help in collection and compilation of data. Antibiotic Stewardship Recommendations include constituting a team, close coordination between teams, audit, formulary restriction, de-escalation, optimizing dosing, active use of information technology among other measure. The recommendations in these guidelines are intended to support, and not replace, good clinical judgment. The recommendations are rated by a letter that indicates the strength of the recommendation and a Roman numeral that indicates the quality of evidence supporting the recommendation, so that readers can ascertain how best to apply the recommendations in their practice environments.
47
Leonard A. Mermel, Michael Allon, Emilio Bouza et al. · Clinical Infectious Diseases · 2009 · 3.6K citations · Full text
Jane D. Siegel, Emily Rhinehart, Marguerite M. Jackson et al. · American Journal of Infection Control · 2007 · 3.5K citations · Full text
Public Health, Infectious Disease Control, Infectious Diseases +16
Timothy H. Dellit, Robert C. Owens, John E. McGowan et al. · Clinical Infectious Diseases · 2006 · 3.4K citations · Full text