Publication | Closed Access
Validation of UARS Microwave Limb Sounder temperature and pressure measurements
70
Citations
36
References
1996
Year
EngineeringMicrowave Limb SounderMechanical EngineeringAtmospheric SoundingAcoustic SensorGeophysicsCalibrationMicrometeorologyAtmospheric ScienceMeteorological MeasurementInstrumentationAtmospheric SensingMeteorologyMicrowave Remote SensingRadiation MeasurementMicrowave MeasurementRadiometryPressure MeasurementsSpace WeatherMls TemperaturesAtmospheric RadiationRadiofrequency HeatingSatellite MeteorologyWinter Mls
The accuracy and precision of the Upper Atmosphere Research Satellite (UARS) Microwave Limb Sounder (MLS) atmospheric temperature and tangent‐point pressure measurements are described. Temperatures and tangent‐point pressure (atmospheric pressure at the tangent height of the field of view boresight) are retrieved from a 15‐channel 63‐GHz radiometer measuring O 2 microwave emissions from the stratosphere and mesosphere. The Version 3 data (first public release) contains scientifically useful temperatures from 22 to 0.46 hPa. Accuracy estimates are based on instrument performance, spectroscopic uncertainty and retrieval numerics, and range from 2.1 K at 22 hPa to 4.8 K at 0.46 hPa for temperature and from 200 m (equivalent log pressure) at 10 hPa to 300 m at 0.1 hPa. Temperature accuracy is limited mainly by uncertainty in instrument characterization, and tangent‐point pressure accuracy is limited mainly by the accuracy of spectroscopic parameters. Precisions are around 1 K and 100 m. Comparisons are presented among temperatures from MLS, the National Meteorological Center (NMC) stratospheric analysis and lidar stations at Table Mountain, California, Observatory of Haute Provence (OHP), France, and Goddard Spaceflight Center, Maryland. MLS temperatures tend to be 1–2 K lower than NMC and lidar, but MLS is often 5 – 10 K lower than NMC in the winter at high latitudes, especially within the northern hemisphere vortex. Winter MLS and OHP (44°N) lidar temperatures generally agree and tend to be lower than NMC. Problems with Version 3 MLS temperatures and tangent‐point pressures are identified, but the high precision of MLS radiances will allow improvements with better algorithms planned for the future.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1