Journal of Oral Science · 2013 · 13 citations · 27 references
DentistryEndodonticsEndodontic MicrobiologyOral MicrobiologyRoot Canal TherapyCanal CleaningEndodontic PathogensIntracanal MedicamentsMicrobiological AnalysisOral Bacterial InfectionsAntibacterial Intracanal MedicamentsAntibacterial PropertiesAntimicrobial Efficacy TestingColony-forming Unit EnumerationEndodontic IrrigantsEnterococcus Faecalis In EndodonticsHydrogen Peroxide TreatmentRoot Canal Microbiology
The aim of the present study was to compare the in vitro antibacterial activity of common root canal irrigants with a combination technique against intratubular Enterococcus faecalis. Seventy-five human single-rooted teeth were selected and their crowns and root-ends were removed to obtain specimens 5 mm in length. The specimens were contaminated with E. faecalis and divided into five experimental groups (n = 15). These groups were irrigated with 2% chlorhexidine (CHX), 3% hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), 5.25% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), CHX/H2O2 and sterile saline (control). Surface and deep dentinal chips were collected for each sample. After incubation, the numbers of colony-forming units (CFUs) were counted. The Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests were used for statistical analysis (α = 0.05). In the surface dentin, CHX, NaOCl, and CHX/H2O2 had significantly higher antibacterial activity than H2O2 (P < 0.05). In the deep dentin, NaOCl and CHX/H2O2 had significantly higher antibacterial activity than CHX and H2O2 (P < 0.05). CHX/H2O2 had similar antibacterial effectiveness to NaOCl in both surface and deep dentinal tubules. This combination can be considered a potentially useful irrigant for root canal treatment.
27
In vitro Infection and of Dentinal Tubules
Markus Haapasalo, Dag Ørstavik · Journal of Dental Research · 1987 · 819 citations
Brenda Paula Figueiredo de Almeida Gomes, Caio Cézar Randi Ferraz, M. E. Vianna et al. · International Endodontic Journal · 2001 · 491 citations