Climate Policy · 2009 · 137 citations · 61 references
Social SciencesEnvironmental PolicyPublic PolicyClimate PolicyEnvironmental JusticeTheory Of JusticeClimate EthicsClimate GovernanceClimate JusticeDistributive JusticeEnvironmental EthicsInternational Climate PolicyClimate Policy EthicsClimate Policy GovernanceFairness PrinciplesInternational Distributive Justice
Distributive justice in climate change has attracted interest from ethics and climate policy scholars, yet these fields remain largely separate, and key assumptions about technology, sovereignty, substitution, and public perceptions of ethics have been largely overlooked in shaping justice outcomes. The article combines applied ethics with detailed analysis of international climate policies to propose two arguments. The authors identify three categories of climate policy proposals based on assumptions about the problem, burdens, and distribution rules, and argue that assumptions about technology, sovereignty, substitution, and public perceptions of ethics shape justice outcomes. Each policy category has implications for distributive justice, and the study concludes that defining, measuring, and distributing burdens are crucial.
Distributive justice in climate change has been of interest both to the ethics and to the climate policy communities, but the two have remained relatively isolated. By combining an applied ethics approach with a focus on the details of a wide range of proposed international climate policies, this article proposes two arguments. First, three categories of proposals are identified, each characterized by its assumptions about the nature of the ‘problem’ of climate change, the burdens that this problem imposes, and its application of distribution rules. Each category presents potential implications for distributive justice. The second, related, argument is that assumptions about technology, sovereignty, substitution and public perceptions of ethics shape the distributive justice outcomes of proposed policies even though these areas have largely been overlooked in discussions of the subject in either literature. The final lesson of this study is that the definition, measurement and distribution of burdens are ...
61
Justice as Fairness: A Restatement
Thaddeus Metz, John Rawls, Erin I. Kelly · The Philosophical Review · 2002 · 3.5K citations
Martin L. Weitzman · The Review of Economic Studies · 1974 · 2.8K citations
Utilitarianism: For and Against.
Gerald Dworkin, J. J. C. Smart, Bernard Williams · The Philosophical Review · 1975 · 878 citations