Conceptualizations of justice in climate policy

Sonja Klinsky, Hadi Dowlatabadi

Climate Policy · 2009 · 137 citations · 61 references

Concepts

TL;DR

Distributive justice in climate change has attracted interest from ethics and climate policy scholars, yet these fields remain largely separate, and key assumptions about technology, sovereignty, substitution, and public perceptions of ethics have been largely overlooked in shaping justice outcomes. The article combines applied ethics with detailed analysis of international climate policies to propose two arguments. The authors identify three categories of climate policy proposals based on assumptions about the problem, burdens, and distribution rules, and argue that assumptions about technology, sovereignty, substitution, and public perceptions of ethics shape justice outcomes. Each policy category has implications for distributive justice, and the study concludes that defining, measuring, and distributing burdens are crucial.

Abstract

Distributive justice in climate change has been of interest both to the ethics and to the climate policy communities, but the two have remained relatively isolated. By combining an applied ethics approach with a focus on the details of a wide range of proposed international climate policies, this article proposes two arguments. First, three categories of proposals are identified, each characterized by its assumptions about the nature of the ‘problem’ of climate change, the burdens that this problem imposes, and its application of distribution rules. Each category presents potential implications for distributive justice. The second, related, argument is that assumptions about technology, sovereignty, substitution and public perceptions of ethics shape the distributive justice outcomes of proposed policies even though these areas have largely been overlooked in discussions of the subject in either literature. The final lesson of this study is that the definition, measurement and distribution of burdens are ...

References

61