A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN LAPAROSCOPIC AND ROBOTICALLY ASSISTED PYELOPLASTY IN THE PEDIATRIC POPULATION

Abstract

You have accessJournal of Urology1 Apr 2008A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN LAPAROSCOPIC AND ROBOTICALLY ASSISTED PYELOPLASTY IN THE PEDIATRIC POPULATION Steve Kim, Daniel Canter, Nicholas Leone, Rakesh Patel, and Pasquale Casale Steve KimSteve Kim , Daniel CanterDaniel Canter , Nicholas LeoneNicholas Leone , Rakesh PatelRakesh Patel , and Pasquale CasalePasquale Casale View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(08)61045-9AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail "A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN LAPAROSCOPIC AND ROBOTICALLY ASSISTED PYELOPLASTY IN THE PEDIATRIC POPULATION." The Journal of Urology, 179(4S), p. 357 © 2008 by American Urological AssociationFiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byBraga L, Lorenzo A, Bägli D, Mahdi M, Salle J, Khoury A and Farhat W (2018) Comparison of Flank, Dorsal Lumbotomy and Laparoscopic Approaches for Dismembered Pyeloplasty in Children Older Than 3 Years With Ureteropelvic Junction ObstructionJournal of Urology, VOL. 183, NO. 1, (306-311), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2010. Volume 179Issue 4SApril 2008Page: 357 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2008 by American Urological AssociationMetricsAuthor Information Steve Kim More articles by this author Daniel Canter More articles by this author Nicholas Leone More articles by this author Rakesh Patel More articles by this author Pasquale Casale More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...