Physical Review C · 2004 · 225 citations · 47 references
Natural SciencesPhysicsNuclear ChemistryNuclear MaterialsNuclear PhysicsExotic NucleiNuclear FusionNuclear ModelsNuclear ScatteringElastic Neutron ScatteringElastic ScatteringElastic Scattering Cross SectionsElastic Wave ScatteringFusion ScatteringFusion TheoryNuclear Level StructureNuclear Structure Determination
Many precision fusion excitation functions above the average barrier have been fitted with a Woods‑Saxon nuclear potential, yet previous explanations for the unusually large diffuseness parameter \(a\) invoke departures from this form and dissipative effects. This study argues that the large \(a\) values are an artifact of modeling the inherently dynamical fusion process with a static potential. The authors attribute deviations from the trend to systematic data errors or structure effects such as octupole coupling, and propose that fusion inhibition via deep‑inelastic scattering—both requiring dynamical calculations—may also play a role. Fusion fits yield diffuseness parameters 0.75–1.5 fm—larger than the ~0.65 fm that reproduces elastic scattering—and these values increase with \(Z_{1}Z_{2}\), with indications of neutron‑richness and deformation; additionally, measured fusion barriers are consistently lower than bare potentials, an effect that grows with \(Z_{1}Z_{2}\) and is partly due to coupling to isoscalar giant‑quadrupole resonances, implying that collective couplings substantially lower the barrier.
A large number of precision fusion excitation functions, at energies above the average fusion barriers, have been fitted using the Woods-Saxon form for the nuclear potential in a barrier passing model of fusion. They give values for the empirical diffuseness parameter $a$ ranging between 0.75 and $1.5\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{fm}$, compared with values of about $0.65\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{fm}$ which generally reproduce elastic scattering data. There is a clear tendency for the deduced $a$ to increase strongly with the reaction charge product ${Z}_{1}{Z}_{2}$, and some evidence for the effect of nuclear structure on the value of $a$, particularly with regard to the degree of neutron richness of the fusing nuclei, and possibly with regard to deformation. The measured fusion-barrier energies are always lower than those of the bare potentials used, which is expected as a result of adiabatic coupling to high energy collective states. This difference increases with increasing ${Z}_{1}{Z}_{2}$ and calculations show that about $1∕3$ of it may be attributed to coupling to the isoscalar giant-quadrupole resonances in the target and projectile. Coupling to all giant resonances may account for a significant part. Fluctuations about the trend line may be due to systematic errors in the data and/or structure effects such as coupling to collective octupole states. Previously suggested reasons for the large values of $a$ have been related to departures from the Woods-Saxon potential and to dissipative effects. This work suggests that the apparently large values of $a$ may be an artifact of trying to describe the dynamical fusion process by use of a static potential. Another partial explaination might reside in fusion inhibition, due for example to deep-inelastic scattering, again a process requiring dynamical calculations.
47
Coupled reaction channels calculations in nuclear physics
I. J. Thompson · Computer Physics Reports · 1988 · 1.8K citations
J. Błocki, J. Randrup, W.J. Świa̧tecki et al. · Annals of Physics · 1977 · 1.6K citations
Interaction Barrier in Charged-Particle Nuclear Reactions
Cheuk-Yin Wong · Physical Review Letters · 1973 · 1.1K citations