Journal of Clinical Pathology · 1988 · 28 citations · 16 references
Life SciencesMicrobiologyBacteriologyDiagnostic MicrobiologyMedical MicrobiologyBioluminescenceClinical BacteriologyDiagnostic BacteriologyMedical BacteriologyMicroscopic ExaminationPathogen DetectionAcridine Orange TestBacterial DetectionBacterial MicroscopyBacteriological DiagnosisBacteriuria DetectionElectrical ImpedanceFalse-positive ResultsMedical Microbial Diagnosis
Six screening methods for the successful detection of significant bacteriuria--electrical impedance (Malthus), automated acridine-orange staining (Autotrak), particle counting (Ramus), bioluminescence, nitrite and leucocyte test strip (BM Nephur), and microscopy--were evaluated. All had excellent predictive values for a negative result (97%-100%) but were less accurate in predicting a positive result (31%-83%). All methods had high sensitivities (83%-100%) but lower levels of specificity (68%-79%). Bioluminescence was the method with the highest specificity (79%) and the lowest rate of false positive results (15%). It would be inappropriate to decide on treatment and management on the basis of the positive results achieved with any of the methods evaluated, but all methods tested could be used for screening out negative results.
16
Asymptomatic Infections of the Urinary Tract*
Edward H. Kass, Maxwell Finland · The Journal of Urology · 2002 · 926 citations
Asymptomatic infections of the urinary tract
Edward H. Kass · The Journal of Urology · 2002 · 179 citations
Seth T. Shaw · JAMA · 1985 · 92 citations
Screening of Urine Cultures by Three Automated Systems
Marie T. Pezzlo, Grace Tan, Ellena M. Peterson et al. · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · 1982 · 67 citations · Full text