Limitations of pulse oximetry: respiratory insufficiency--a failure of detection.

J. A. Davidson, H E Hosie

BMJ · 1993 · 68 citations · 1 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

TL;DR

During gastrulation, pluripotent epiblast cells specify and spatially arrange the three germ layers, and human pluripotent stem cells can mimic this spatial fate specification on micropatterned surfaces. The study develops a mouse PSC micropattern system to model human pluripotent stem cell fate specification and to compare regional identity formation between mouse embryos and in vitro cultures. The authors employed a mouse pluripotent stem cell micropattern system that allows spatially controlled differentiation and direct comparison with mouse embryonic development. BMP, WNT, ACTIVIN, and FGF signaling induced epithelial‑to‑mesenchymal transition and radial patterning of posterior mesoderm, whereas WNT, ACTIVIN, and FGF alone patterned anterior mesoderm and endoderm, and more differentiated epiblast stem cells only specified anterior identities without patterning.

Abstract

<h3>Abstract</h3> During gastrulation pluripotent epiblast cells specify and spatially arrange the three germ layers. Human pluripotent stem cells (PSCs) have been shown to undergo spatially-organized fate specification on micropatterned surfaces. Since <i>in vivo</i> validation is not possible for the human, we developed a mouse PSC micropattern system and, by making direct comparisons to mouse embryos, reveal the robust specification of distinct regional identities. BMP, WNT, ACTIVIN and FGF directed mouse epiblast-like cells to undergo an epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and radially pattern posterior mesoderm fates. Conversely, WNT, ACTIVIN and FGF patterned anterior mesoderm and endoderm identities. By contrast, epiblast stem cells, a more developmentally advanced state, only specified anterior identities but without patterning. The mouse micropattern system offers a robust scalable method to generate regionalized cell types present <i>in vivo</i>, resolve how signals promote distinct cellular identities and generate patterns, and compare mechanisms operating <i>in vivo</i> and <i>in vitro</i> and across species.

References

1