Peer-facilitated eating disorder prevention: A randomized effectiveness trial of cognitive dissonance and media advocacy.

Abstract

This study investigated the effectiveness of two interventions in reducing eating disorder risk factors under naturalistic conditions in sororities.Based on previous research, the campus sororities chose to implement a semi-mandatory, two-session eating disorder prevention program to all new sorority members (N=90) during sorority orientation.To facilitate evaluation, sororities agreed to random assignment of new members to either a cognitive dissonance or media advocacy intervention.Undergraduate peer facilitators ran the groups.Although both interventions had an effect, cognitive dissonance generally was superior at eight-month followup.Results further support the utility of cognitive dissonance in reducing eating disorder risk factors, and suggest that non-doctoral level leaders can deliver the program.Results also indicate that a semi-mandatory format does not reduce effectiveness.