Sensory Integration Therapy: Affect or Effect

Kenneth J. Ottenbacher

American Journal of Occupational Therapy · 1982 · 104 citations · 0 references

Concepts

TL;DR

Sensory integration therapy effectiveness has been examined in numerous studies, and recent quantitative review methods treat the literature review itself as a research process. This review aimed to assess the effectiveness of sensory integration therapy across academic, motor, reflex, and language outcomes. The authors identified 49 studies, selected 8 that met strict inclusion criteria, and extracted 47 statistical hypothesis tests evaluating therapy effects. The quantitative review showed that participants receiving sensory integration therapy performed significantly better than controls, supporting its application across client populations and highlighting the value of quantitative review procedures.

Abstract

Abstract The results of studies examining the effectiveness of sensory integration therapy were reviewed, using recently developed quantitative methods that treat the literature review process as a unique type of research. Forty-nine studies were located initially. Eight of these studies met the following criteria: (a) they investigated the effect of sensory integration therapy; (b) they included dependent measures of academic achievement, motor or reflex performance, and / or language function; (c) they included a comparison between at least two groups; and (d) they reported quantitative results of the effect of sensory integration therapy. The 8 studies contained a total of 47 statistical hypothesis tests that evaluated the effectiveness of sensory integration therapy. An analysis of these tests, using quantitative reviewing methods, revealed that subjects participating in sensory integration therapy performed significantly better than members in the control groups who did not receive sensory integration therapy. The application of sensory integration therapy to various client populations is discussed in relation to the existing empirical support revealed in the studies reviewed. The advantages of quantitative reviewing procedures are discussed, and use of the procedures with the developing occupational therapy research literature is recommended.