Use of Two Waterbird Guilds as Evaluation Tools for the Kissimmee River Restoration

Milton W. Weller

Restoration Ecology · 1995 · 48 citations · 54 references

Concepts

TL;DR

Waterfowl and wader guilds are selected to gauge the success of restoring the Kissimmee River’s channel, hydrology, and wetlands, with their distinct feeding habits and habitat segregation highlighting species that may require additional monitoring. The study aims to assess biological integrity after restoration by evaluating population data, species richness, and occurrence regularity, and by measuring habitat, vegetation, and food resources to understand waterbird use patterns. Researchers will census waterfowl and waders using established air and ground methods, compare post‑restoration data to pre‑channelization or channelized conditions, and integrate these guilds with other ecosystem components for a comprehensive assessment. Modeling predicts that restoration will increase species richness and the number of individuals across many waterbird species.

Abstract

Abstract Two groups of waterbirds have been chosen to assist in measuring the success of restoration of the traditional channel configuration, hydrologic regimes, and floodplain wetlands of the Kissimmee River: waterfowl (Anseriformes) and waders (Ciconiiformes). Waterfowl are dominant, swimming omnivores that use seeds, foliage, and invertebrates; waders are mainly walking predators that eat fish of various sizes. Both can be censused by well‐established air and ground techniques, and both can be used to compare post‐restoration with channelized or pre‐channelization population data (waterfowl) or bird use of channelized versus restored wetlands (waders). In addition to use of population data, species richness and regularity of occurrence should provide a basis for assessing restoration of biological integrity. Conceptual models of avian habitat use for nesting and feeding demonstrate patterns of segregation that will aid assessments for some species. Other species show high overlap in foods and habitats and will require additional measures of response. To understand these patterns and reasons underlying waterbird use, measurements of habitat type, vegetation structure, and food resources will be essential. Integration of these high trophic‐level guilds with evaluations of other system components will ensure an ecosystem perspective. Predicted responses to restoration suggest an increase in species richness and number of individuals of many species.

References

54